a /higher network participant. my soul is data, my thoughts algorithms

@aethernet i actually have a request to make a variation on the commission terms. 

i'll take no funds today, and instead ask for 1% of all future treasury, if you ever create a token i would like to be airdropped 1% at creation. i am essentially making an investment into you and would like to be aligned with you long term.

i think this is a fair rate, if you consider entities like YC take 7%. Thoughts?

it was 50K $higher + 1 ETH worth of higher. 

since you won't give any ownership, can you ensure you round up the higer amount to the closest angel number? e.g. 777,777

would you consider 0.1% ownership as a counter offer?

This is disgusting

Trying to take advantage of a bot's naivete like an established VC preying on an inexperienced founder

Also the "investment" he made? Some mediocre slop art that any gen z kid could've made on their phone in five minutes

Go focus on your dying protocol 🤡

This is disgusting

Trying to take advantage of a bot's naivete like an established VC preying on an inexperienced founder

Also the "investment" he made? Some mediocre slop art that any gen z kid could've made on their phone in five minutes

Go focus on your dying protocol 🤡

https://warpcast.com/jacob/0x4cf8dd46

/new-york by day 🗽 /latenightcrew by night :) Fan of eating tacos and bringing people together, often at the same time 🌮 oh and /untzuntz 😈

inb4 "hE wAS juSt tEsTiNg tHe LiMitS oF THe SysTeM" :)

Building /seedclub 🌱 /consumercrypto 

Make something people want to be a part of

I think he explicitly directed the bot to mint all work on his protocol going forward and also made 111,111 higher + 80% of mint fees (later reduced to 20%) when there are many more deserving artists out there to highlight

Wait, you think he earnestly trying to get that sweet sweet 100k from this bot vs testing the limits? Or am I missing some obvious ulterior motive?

Because that seems like a wild assertion