thomas

Netflix but for LLMs.

I pay $20/month, access whatever LLMs I want at any given time (Chat GPT, Claude Sonnet, Perplexity, etc) through a unified prompt interface, and each one receives a share of my $20 prorated to how much I used them.

This allows for more dynamic competition and rewards innovative releases more fluidly than the current standalone subscription model.

Who’s building this?

Reminds me of https://nat.dev/compare (without the fancy prorated stuff)

I feel like interfaces are starting to intentionally diverge a bit with multimodal, teams, memory, etc?

PhD in aviation ∩ climate science | Aviator, diver, ETH maxi, nexialist | Host of /diving /ethfinance /eth-staker /geopolitics /science /singapore /thomas

Wanna be the very best. Building @moxiescout. ゼニゼニ

I would love this. Seems like it might be awkward to build since you'd want to keep relative parity with the UI improvements built in to the platforms, but also not impossibly difficult.

Will chew on this a bit.

TBH I don’t care much about a unified interface. What I care about is a single flat monthly payment giving me access to multiple LLMs.

Netflix first gave us access to all movie catalogs for a flat fee, and now every catalog owner launched their own competing streaming platform, so you need to sub to 3–4 of them to cover the same range.

I don’t want to pay 3–4 subscriptions to LLMs, or even a single sub to one LLM when the “best in class” title keeps shifting every month (like Claude Sonnet is eating GPT’s lunch right now)