If you like the call for client diversity, here are a few things you should consider:

We love @BlockscanHQ, but relying solely on Blockscan poses a risk to decentralization. Start using @blockscoutcom and other block explorers.

We also love the EIP website: https://eips.ethereum.org/. However, relying solely on it poses a risk to decentralization. Please also try https://eip.fun/ made by @EIPFun and https://eips.pandapip1.com made by Pandapip1.

We love #EIP, #ERC, and #RIP, but please also explore other improvement proposals such as #ENSIP (ENS Improvement Proposals) by @ensdao, pushed by @nicksdjohnson, #SIP (Seaport Improvement Proposals) by @opensea, pushed by @z0age, and...

... #CCIP (Chain Agnostics Improvement Proposals) by @mr_ligi, @pedrouid, and Juan Bumblefudge. There is also BIP of #Bitcoin and #RFC of @ietf etc. 

We love @ProtocolGuild, but please also pay attention to Wallet dev groups by @_SamWilsn_, #AllERCDevs groups, and other developer groups.

We love #Web3js, but @ricmoo built #EtherJS when they weren't motivated enough to merge a pull request to fix a bug.

We love ERC-4337 but also follow other Account Abstraction options such as ERC-721A / LIP by @feindura, EIP-3074 AUTH and AUTHCALL, ERC-6551, #Delegatable by @danfinlay , and ERC-5453.

Competition is good, client diversity is good, working group diversity is good.

Someone once said, "The mindset that every problem needs to be solved by EF (@ethereum) or 'someone with authority' is a problem itself."

Be open, explore choices, be free, vote with your feet.