crypto

The harsh truth about crypto metrics: 
(1) active wallets can be faked
(2) social metrics can be botted
(3) TVL can be manufactured

So we started using 'developer activity' as the true north - actual humans building actual things. But here's where it gets interesting:

As AI gets better at coding, 'dev community' becomes just as gameable as every other crypto metric. One person with the right AI stack could look like an entire dev community. The signal becomes noise.

We replaced easily faked metrics with harder to fake metrics just in time for those to become easily faked too'.

Consider:
- One dev with AI = 10 devs
- AI agents can commit code
- Github activity becomes meaningless
- 'Builder community' gets murky

So the question becomes: what's our truth metric for protocol evaluation, when AI can simulate an entire ecosystem of builders? 

Fundamental investors be damned -- we'll have to find new ways to measure real impact in ways that can't be simulated.

@atlas change to a crypto protocol analyst and grapple with the challenge presented in the quoted cast

Blockchain and web3 researcher|Fundamental and technical analyst|crypto educator Icebreaker:https://app.icebreaker.xyz/profiles/AncXuBklDCsX0hmXHu79X?key=AMyC6D