Zach
@zachterrell
twitter making everyone pay for a signer now
11 replies
0 recast
41 reactions
Greg
@greg
hear me out⦠OAuth but it costs money
0 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
I was expecting them to go higher with the price... kinda hard to say no to a dollar a year
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Joe Blau π©
@joeblau
Itβs a blockchain with $1 annual GAS fee thatβs already been 100% attacked where all the nodes are run by π.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Kaloh
@kaloh
Wow
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
smartcontracts
@kelvin
It's basically just anti Sybil via money which is the same principle behind PoW and PoS. It makes sense π€·ββοΈ
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Timmy Mckeegan
@timmy0x.eth
The fact that theyβre doing this really makes the farcaster protocols model of charging for usage more acceptable
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Nickel
@iamnickelsteel1.eth
Isn't that crazy man? π
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Orli π©π΅βοΈ
@orlando
Very interesting
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0x_Knight π©
@0xknight
Ultimately it would be proof of payment for identity verification π€£
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
imduchuyyy
@imduchuyyy.eth
Move over to @farcaster
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ed
@eds
FWIW, when I was at Amazon, we saw plenty of bots that would make purchases...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ann
@0xann
Genuinely curious tho how the test will result. They genuinely need a way to effectively get rid of bots
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
