Clankers

Opacity

farcasterunion

intersend.io | via sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. metamask. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater. darpa. secdef. navy. dia. linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

@accountless.eth fyi, our team paused your access to deploy via @ clanker on Warpcast, for the time being. 

Ultimately, how we design our product is upstream of how users engage with it. 

We are working on implementing better UX that will help users to engage with clanker positively. 

Interface moderation and curation will be increasingly important as we work towards making our contracts permissionless. Will follow up about this at a later date after we implement more comprehensive moderation

Are consent and permission synonymous? We live in a post post modern world where there’s a little gray area with respect to IP

On the one hand, OpenAI believes access to indexable wrote knowledge should be open / free
Yet, on the other they have trained their model on thousands of paid services like The NY Times. Training model content cost is material and if NYT wins lawsuit the S1 risk is magnified 1000x

Back when YouTube had DMCA takedown requests / they also gave IP owner the right to claim the ad revenue from their content as an alt to removal. Might be an approach to permissionless consent. 

Either takedown or takeover fees… prove you minted the content onchain first, you win provenance 

@dawufi /opacity use case? 

Adjacent to this: Anybody remember this Yuga labs lawsuit?

vibes and status at /opacity --
host of vibe check podcast 
▶️ https://pods.media/vibe-check
❄️ icebreaker.xyz/dawufi
👀 seemore.tv/free/fc/dawufi

Are consent and permission synonymous? We live in a post post modern world where there’s a little gray area with respect to IP

On the one hand, OpenAI believes access to indexable wrote knowledge should be open / free
Yet, on the other they have trained their model on thousands of paid services like The NY Times. Training model content cost is material and if NYT wins lawsuit the S1 risk is magnified 1000x

Back when YouTube had DMCA takedown requests / they also gave IP owner the right to claim the ad revenue from their content as an alt to removal. Might be an approach to permissionless consent. 

Either takedown or takeover fees… prove you minted the content onchain first, you win provenance 

@dawufi /opacity use case? 

Adjacent to this: Anybody remember this Yuga labs lawsuit?

https://blockworks.co/news/bayc-yuga-labs-ryder-ripps-lawsuit

The programmable IP layer that transforms IPs into networks that transcend mediums and platforms, unleashing global creativity and liquidity
Storyprotocol.xyz

Kidding (By Default) 🧧 icbk.me/zachharris.eth

Yeah I wanna do this actually. Probably need story protocol bought in or something but that's a @storyprotocol problem not mine :)