Web3CN 研究所

A couple of years ago, I identified two main usecases for blockchains: objective money/finance and objective identity

However, over time, I've warmed to the idea that objective identity does not actually require strict global consensus. A less strict, loosely ordered global consensus may be adequate

Really, it's only money that requires strict consensus, or anything else of *temporal* economic value

While identity does have economic value, it is in most cases non-temporal in nature, and can hence be achieved better with loosely ordered alternatives to blockchains

身份上链也许是个伪命题？
客观身份也许并不需要严格的全球共识想法，一个不那么严格、松散有序的全球共识可能就足够了——只有钱才需要严格的共识。

身份上链也许是个伪命题？
客观身份也许并不需要严格的全球共识想法，一个不那么严格、松散有序的全球共识可能就足够了——只有钱才需要严格的共识。
https://warpcast.com/polynya/0x9ad7a382