wen negative moxie

ie

"this cast was so offensive, useless and damaged it's viewers so much, we are penalizing them THIS MUCH moxie"

HAM 🍖

The Crucible

Working on Moxie at Airstack| airstack.xyz | moxie.xyz | hihi! 


Currently deploying. Unofficial head platypus of /lp 

Whatever your decentralized, borderless, neutral, censorship-resistant open blockchain question is, the answer is YES… to Crypto!

frames, frames, frames

/bleu bleuonbase.twitter

Maybe a way to view, comment or otherwise interact with a cast, but say "I don't want to increase it's Moxie"

ie

"I think you're a scammer who is trying to engage dishonestly.  demoxie"

"demoxie" would tell moxie parsers "don't count this comment or my like/recast"

@betashop.eth any plans on doing this? we're early for the negative but both @deployer did it with tomatoes on /lp and degen with dedegen and /crucible modding

wondering when we'll get there, not engaging is the most similar but there's no negative yet.

unfortunately we can't reply to obvious spammers or AI bots to give proper feedback without also increasing their moxie

its a key feature of cast scores that there is no negative scoring, no one is penalized

Navigating the world of finance by day, pondering its flaws by night. ETH Maxi

it would still need to "cost" something, otherwise same problem as free email invites spam

I'd even be down for "I'm willing to burn some of my own moxie rewards to disincentivize this user/cast because it so negatively impacts the ecosystem"

but I haven't thought through how to anti-game it.

Can you imagine the chaos if there was anonymous downvoting? 👺