0xmons

@xmon.eth

142 Following

2277 Followers

0xmons pfp

What a wonderful addition

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xmons pfp

https://x.com/josephdelong/status/1843040034364285061?t=V5FDAyfvGfjxiId6S4OLkA ah i think it's yes

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xmons pfp

for now https://eth95.dev/ is what we got

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xmons pfp

custom errors are still nice, you can parameterize them etc

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xmons pfp

does anyone know if base supports transient storage yet

1 reply

2 recasts

8 reactions

0xmons pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xmons pfp

We are so early

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

I wish they did not require an account to use

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

https://github.com/zkonduit/ezkl is probably still sota rn

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

anoncast pfp

Why is Warpcast so difficult to sign up for, yet it has so many bot users?

2 replies

1 recast

8 reactions

0xmons pfp

Ye i think it was called whirpool?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

0xmons pfp

did u get this from a bot what is the actual danger of staking 0 tokens

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

Someone blew it up on hacker news! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41809469

1 reply

0 recast

9 reactions

0xmons pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

nit: hash usually means the output of a difficult-to-reverse operation if it's just encrypting, the end result isn't usually called a hash

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

anyone know why sepolia is 100x more expensive than mainnet atm

3 replies

2 recasts

62 reactions

0xmons pfp

still not a fan as it makes simulation a strong requirement for interaction on every new chain, which isn't always possible on day one i would prefer that doesn't become the bottleneck, to speak nothing of the cat and mouse games (e.g. salmonella style) as tail risks

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

i think asking for approval at least has widespread wallet support and a straightforward check i think this greatly increases the attack surface--think about it, you'd have to vet literally the entire callstack of everything you call every single time - try to claim tokens, boom drained - try to mint nfts, boom drained - try to register ens, boom drained it makes literally every interaction you make potentially adversarial (!!!) it also doesn't help in a smart contract wallet centric world with paymasters if tx origin isn't the caller

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

For example someone makes an airdrpp contract that gives you free X but also drains u

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

0xmons pfp

This seems pretty dangerous because arbitrary contract calls could drain you. Whereas rn you need to explicitly approve spenders

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction