Antidote pfp

Antidote

@0xantidote.eth

275 Following
407 Followers
Antidote pfp
1 reply
2 recasts
9 reactions
Antidote pfp
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Antidote pfp
11 replies
26 recasts
157 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Antidote pfp
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Antidote pfp
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Antidote pfp
Whether you agree with tariffs or not (I think the *tariffs are always bad* perspectives are somewhat myopic), there are some things that have not been discussed widely that I found particularly questionable. - The EU is demoted to a third party for the US. It is no longer an ally and will be treated the same as adversaries when it comes to trade. The game theory case against the EU is much harder to make than against China. - The accounting for this is HIGHLY selective and intellectually misleading. The US has been flourishing economically in the last decade compared to EU member states. This is also because the US has been leading in software and digital services. Adjust for (digital) services and the trade deficit between the EU and the US shrinks to merely 50B USD. But what if we take other costs into account? The EU also has to bear the majority of cost for migration (both in terms of climate but also conflicts) even though arguably both parties participated in the creation of the problem.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Antidote pfp
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
Antidote pfp
1 reply
2 recasts
14 reactions
Antidote pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Antidote pfp
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions