Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
nounspaceTom.eth
@nounspacetom
gm friends! Today I woke up to some false, negative (and imho, rude) comments from @frog and @jkm.eth on our candidate prop to double down on /nounspace. @krel signaled against too (sadly no feedback yet). I just responded and hope they'll reconsider (it doesn't seem like they actually read the prop yet, let alone tried the product). For those of you that have actually been following what the team and I have been working so hard on these past few months, would appreciate your support in refuting them. Would hate to see one of, if not the best opportunity available to /nouns (in my humble, biased opinion) abandoned due to a few false, negative takes. I'm gonna go ahead and post it here for anyone that's curious. Always happy to answer any questions, and would prefer open convos in public rather than jumping to literally the worst possible conclusions/accusations. Can also read it and their comments here: https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/double-down-on-nounspacewtf-06ae622bf2029db79bdebd38f723f1f33f95f6c5
6 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
willywonka ⌐◨-◨
@willywonka.eth
wow, very hurtful and sad to see from people we thought were our friends. i'm all about constructive criticism or well-reasoned feedback, but was sad to only see the opposite of that from y'all on our candidate prop. assuming the absolute worst while doing seemingly zero research, asking any questions, or acknowledging any positives, of which there are plenty to choose from. proud to have a CEO that's not afraid to call out BS 🫡
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nounspaceTom.eth
@nounspacetom
No wei am I going to let people talk to you and the rest of the team like that. I'm the only one allowed to talk to y'all that way!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
