whilethe pfp

whilethe

@whilethe

81 Following
1649 Followers


whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Yes, it happened in the past. However, it is worth putting yourself in the position of the head of the Degen community and we will be able to understand why they do what they do
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
I think that together with the team, we will be able to make degen great again. Not everyone becomes a professional at once)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Interesting idea from the authors of the token, thank you for sharing the idea, I will follow the development of events 4040 $degen
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Yes, I certainly understand the idea that Jacek wants to promote into the community and I like this idea and I share the desire to fully promote degen to the masses, but not in such radical ways) 🥴
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
I tried to create something really interesting, I’m glad you liked it) 😁
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
It’s true, the community should develop together. And get rid of weeds and farmers together👍🏼
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Wow, these words and photos deserve applause, let it be as you wished, my friend!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
We all wait for this and believe in it 🔥
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Let’s rain some degen 🎩 rain 6000 $degen Let’s take it for the slogan: «Together we will make degen great again!» Let’s support our beloved Degen
80 replies
62 recasts
132 reactions

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
make $degen great again 🥹
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Yes, this is a really fair world in which such big farmers as @pichi get everything, and the guys who try to make content and make money on it get a ban list Good job, jacek
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Apparently, a global audit of accounts was carried out on this date, but why these checks did not become regular, that’s the question
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
I would really like them to pay attention to this mistake and correct it. let’s hope so
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Yes, this is the main problem now. We know the evaluation criteria, but we don’t have fresh data. It’s even funny to some extent)🫠
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Wave of bans, or how the spam tagging system works... The recent wave of bans left a huge number of questions about its transparency and correct operation. I noticed that the "spam" labels are not issued quite correctly and the bans were made largely on the basis of outdated data, described in detail in the article, which is presented below at the link. Write your opinion about this in the comments I would like this to be brought to attention @jacek @v https://paragraph.xyz/@0xc91927f14a97c182afad0a01774e9710ad8f01dd/wave-of-bans,-or-how-the-spam-tagging-system-works
7 replies
8 recasts
34 reactions

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
The idea is certainly great and I like how the $Degen ecosystem develops and the values you want to instill in the community. However, the means to achieve this goal, in my opinion, were chosen incorrectly. I would like more transparency in terms of marking a user with the «Spam» label. Since now there is no accurate and up-to-date data on the basis of which a particular user is marked with the «Spam» tag.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
@mcdegen 6500 degen to depe
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
@mcdegen 7200 degen to depe
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
I decided to use the "Paragraph.xyz" service and the first project that will be published here is Spectral Labs. Happy reading, I hope you find the new post format useful
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

whilethe pfp
whilethe
@whilethe
Yes, I agree with you. Clearly, it is better to work on the filters under which the content will be selected, otherwise you may face constant injustice and dissatisfaction of the audience
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction