Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Burr πŸ“ pfp
Burr πŸ“
@burrrrrberry
HAM debrief: - Users with ~0 community pts saw 1:10 conversion rate - Users with 10k community pts saw ~1:4 conversation rate - Claiming was relatively painless on the new HAM CHAIN (thx @deployer) - Ham.fun site is nice to use Mechanics can change but now we know how much CP matter. More on my own numbers πŸ‘‡
13 replies
1 recast
31 reactions

Wellzy πŸŽ©πŸ°πŸ– pfp
Wellzy πŸŽ©πŸ°πŸ–
@wellzy
I appreciate you sharing all of your ham info. We went about it totally different but I wouldn't change how I did it. I used the ham cannon but mostly as a means to interact. If I had 100 comments on a cast I probably interacted with at least half, and sometimes a lot more. It was a ton of fun.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

aqueous πŸŽ©πŸ–πŸŽ­πŸ‘‘ pfp
aqueous πŸŽ©πŸ–πŸŽ­πŸ‘‘
@aqueous
You were good at engaging back almost all the time.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Burr πŸ“ pfp
Burr πŸ“
@burrrrrberry
Definitely! I like to explore all options. I've repeatedly said Im jealous of the cannons. I bet you crushed this claim and deservedly so. You put massive work in 🫑πŸ”₯ I'd love to see your breakdown too, perhaps a hybrid is the ideal strategy
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction