Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Welcome to @balajis.eth! He’s kindly agreed to do an AMA. Reply with your questions. :)
168 replies
54 recasts
407 reactions
web3dΞv.eth | sonsOfCrypto.com
@web3d3v
Q 2/5: Places with very low population density (& lot of sun), underdeveloped countries may want to develop. Seems like there should be a way to stuck a deal exchanging sovereignty for development. (eg Namibia) https://shorturl.at/enHT4 Do you see that as viable, would you advocate pursuing that approach ?
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
balajis
@balajis.eth
It may be viable, but I would work with middle income or even high income countries first rather than extremely low income countries. The reason is that any deal struck with an unstable low income country will (a) be attacked from the outside as exploitation and (b) attacked from inside due to political instability.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
web3dΞv.eth | sonsOfCrypto.com
@web3d3v
a) Do we care? I think it is a safe bet Network State will be attacked by the wokes either way/ 2) I think military supremacy via technological supremacy is paramount once sovereignty is achieved. Network State may need Israel at its height level military capability, no matter where it is. Given tumultuous times ahead
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
