usually not fully bearish on any tech but I really do not think calorie counting using purely vision is ever going to work. way too much variance in preparation methods that afaik cannot be picked up visually. 200-300 cal. margin of error is the difference between maintenance and gaining 1lb/week

cto @ bwl.gg (lunchbreak.com), 80M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 built @remindme, @mintit, @gpt, @healthbot, farcantasy.xyz

is this... really... a concept??? agree so 10000 $degen

fwiw intuitive eating or — sue me — GLP1s are the way to go for weight loss

where's @warpcastadmin.eth on this thread lol

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

intuitive eating doesn't work for the majority of the population

using computer vision for calorie counting has been the nuclear fusion or room temperature superconductors of dieting

but the issue is that a tablespoon of butter or oil is like a gazillion of calories and virtually invisible