gm, if you are alive in the next 30 years, chances are you're going to live forever

it is stupid to risk this immortality by doing things that can kill you beforehand

cto @ bwl.gg, 100M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 $eggs is life

Have thought about this kinda stuff for years. What level of immortality do you think we need to really “live forever”?

I think we’re close to biological immortality aka reverse aging, but we’re still prone to diseases & environment, and our brains are still primed for shorter lifespans. How do we progress?

co-founder @ponder @survey // benadamsky.com

either biological or artificial

technically, we can avoid a lot of issues by having artificial organs too!

> I’m sure most people prob couldn’t handle being placed in a synthetic body.

when it comes to a choice between dying or artificial body

dying people would almost always chose not dying

it's easy to speculate when we're not dying

ask people who are dying right now if they'd want to live more

also, resource scarcity is almost non-existent, even at 8b people we have resource abundance

we also have a whole galaxy of resources to exploit

I’d say biological is prob the right path in the short-term (the next several generations). Even if we somehow had the tech, I’m sure most people prob couldn’t handle being placed in a synthetic body.

Even though we’ll face major humanity issues like resource scarcity, I’m very bullish on longevity.