Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/words
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
"Writers, Web3, and Earning a Living," a 3 min read from last month, is my most popular work on @paragraph. Someday I hope to write another piece about how web3 fundamentally changed the earnings landscape for writers. https://paragraph.xyz/@danicaswanson/writers-web3-and-earning-a-living?referrer=danicaswanson.eth
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
loved this one! such a great, concise overview of the power of monetizing in web3
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
Glad you enjoyed it! With all due respect, an "overview of the power of monetizing in web3" was not at all my intent with this piece. So if that's your takeaway, I have more work to do. My aim was to point out a value flow dynamic that constrains creative work in web3 & invite deeper questioning of the status quo.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
That said, it's fundamentally a hopeful and optimistic piece, in that I wouldn't have even bothered writing and publishing it if I didn't think web3 had genuine capacity to address the underlying issues I discussed.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
definitely! and this is more what I was getting at. I think we have taken steps towards it, but there still needs to be a social contract-esque update to the valuation of writing as an art form I think AI generation is a problem, but that people will still value human-authenticated experiences as story
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Danica Swanson
@danicaswanson
I agree wholeheartedly that there's a need to address "the valuation of writing as an art form." We have a long way to go on that, but admittedly it's a really hard problem. Would love to see much more discussion of that problem space. I'll have more to say about that in future writings. Thanks for the discussion!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
