Warpcast

On a web3 journey. Guiding friends & allies on adventures in the new world |

Nouncil | web3 storytelling | iambradq on Twitter | FC OG

It goes a bit deeper than that. It's been a while since the term was used in the scenius here on Farcaster. The idea is that to get traction, you need to have content, and the people who drive the conversations here (so not just the conversation starters, but also the ones who keep that conversation going) are providing valuable growth liquidity. 
If I remember correctly, it was also in contrast to low effort casting. With all respect for the ritualistic GM (and Bonj') -ing, if that is all you see when you enter a new social network, and replies like wowow (hence the wowow like button), it is not the most attractive place to put your heart and soul in. The CLPs provide that welcoming and attractive environment.

Consistently providing conversational liquidity (i.e., thoughtful, context-aware casts that encourage discussion) takes considerable time and effort. I'd love to see the FC ecosystem make better provisions for funding the CLPs. 

Adrienne's idea is intriguing. Could rewards based on some sort of "CLP score" work well for this?  

Curious to hear more thoughts. 🧠 🤔 

https://warpcast.com/wanderloots.eth/0xb83d8f34

@arjantupan has a great take on conversational liquidity providers (CLPs):

"The idea is that to get traction, you need to have content, and the people who drive the conversations here (so not just the conversation starters, but also the ones who keep that conversation going) are providing valuable growth liquidity."

A teller / of stories, that is me. / Curious to learn new ways to see. / Proud dad of two. Now, what / about you? | Builds https://paragraph.xyz/@trpplffct

@arjantupan has a great take on conversational liquidity providers (CLPs):

"The idea is that to get traction, you need to have content, and the people who drive the conversations here (so not just the conversation starters, but also the ones who keep that conversation going) are providing valuable growth liquidity."

https://warpcast.com/danicaswanson/0x105fdbf0

Writer, senior editor, music nerd, GenX eldergoth, monastery-bootstrapper. https://paragraph.xyz/@danicaswanson https://tinyurl.com/Black-Stone-Wordsmith

I like that framing, it’s aligned with what I was describing as valuable in the cast you quoted earlier, the need to accrue value that builds over time, rather than have it get swept away in the chaos stream. 

The question I have is: how? How do we track the value input for people that continue taking conversations deeper? The ones who keep the convo going so we actually arrive at the crux of the nuance between viewpoints in a way that actually shifts public perspective on important topics? 🤔 something I think about a lot