If you:
1. Like crypto
2. Are mad that there are a lot of coins 

I’d highly recommend Bitcoin maximalism. Otherwise: tokenize everything. There is no inbetween.

i like crypto, and i like that there are a lot of coins, the more the better

and i also hope that onchain art isn’t fractionalized coins at the beginning, these aren’t mutually exclusive imo

do i think the creator should have say in how their art is distributed? hell yeah

ado i think that the creator should capture 99% of the value of their art? hell yeah

i respect and appreciate u guys pushing the space forward, just wanted to give some thoughts as someone who is active both in creating and collecting - i’m finding it hard to buy in to the current model, and i may change my mind over time but that’s just how i feel today

investor, photographer, nomad, exploring onchain & exploring the 🌎 /positivesum

Yeah agreed. I understand the theory and the system, but not how it is actually sustainable for creators 

What do you envision enables a creator to capture 99% of the value?

/cal 

Photographer, Artist, Web3 Educator, IP Lawyer, Patent Agent, Explorer 📸⛰️✨ 

 Building /flowcast with /mindfulness 🌊

https://wanderloots.com/links

i think the backend has been as simplified as it can be now though? E.g., anyone can launch any token with any amount and distribution. 

I think we're less in a backend building era and more in an incentive building era. How can we actually incentivize a digital economy that is not 100% speculative, since artists inherently shy away from that type of behaviour?

i think the distribution needs to be open, fc preferred as of now given that it’s platform agnostic

the backend should simplify w time, but where do the creators feel most valued + incentivized and collectors have wide access - these are what will drive the best distribution source long term imo