Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/cal
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
I say it again: the time is here (has been for a while now) to separate art from “post tokens” aka rodeo mints aka content coins “cointent” Content = stickers, not art But this requires a fundamental shift in how we view scarcity & abundance, onchain: https://paragraph.xyz/@wanderloots.eth/post-tokens?referrer=wanderloots.eth
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
One chain, one contract, one creator
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
What do you mean?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
I reread your post from last fall. Until we have true decentralization, it’s like shooting buck shot. Creators need sovereignty
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
Ohhh I see! Yes for sure. And I think that will be the role for Art = sovereignty But I do see a place for “post tokens” or “content coins” as distinct from art to micro transaction support creators
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
I’m not really certain about this. For one thing, content coins are scattered across chains. Is Uniswap really gonna determine the value of something? Then we’re back to centralization. Where is the gain?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Callum Wanderloots ✨
@wanderloots.eth
The gain is that the average person can’t afford $20 + pieces of art on a regular basis, but they can afford $0.25 content to show support for creators If the goal is to bring an economic layer to all media on the internet, it’s going to happen on a micro scale. The real issue (imo) is how do we retain value for the scarce assets that are produced, while giving value to the abundant ones?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
CarCulture.eth🎩 🔵
@carculture.eth
The only way to maintain values for the abundant assets is through decentralization.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
