Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Maretus
@maretus
X has just unveiled a massive update to their creator revenue share program. What do you think of this? Me? I’ll take Farcaster & Moxie over this all day long. https://x.com/x/status/1844066291625361812?s=46
76 replies
26 recasts
95 reactions
wake
@wake.eth
been sifting through the actual details of this. there are eligibility requirements, but i can't tell if they're middle of the road or excessive. >must have premium sub... >5m or more organic impressions / 90 days >and 500 or more premium followers x users are compelled to shill x subscriptions to their followers (a shitcoin, basically) on the premise that /up to/ 25% of that revenue will get shared with creators. that "up to" will do a lot of work on behalf of X; it's a global ceiling, but permits them a lot of control over individual payouts. as with their ads program, i assume high profile x users will promote the service hard (like a shitcoin) by showing off their earnings. so it's a ponzu, basically. x users will shill the subscription shitcoin and it isn't likely to produce qDAU (as farcaster has learned the hard way).
8 replies
4 recasts
30 reactions
KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ
@kmacb.eth
Compelled to shill x isn’t much different than FC 🤣😭
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
wake
@wake.eth
right. so there are parallels, but significant central differences that could make for /very/ useful comparison some day. farcaster's more decentralized earning ponzu... versus twitter's fully centralized earning ponzu. I'll take the more organic, more anti-fragile option any day.
1 reply
2 recasts
4 reactions
KMac🍌 ⏩ ツ
@kmacb.eth
🤝
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
