Farcaster

Looking for honest feedback—no need to sugarcoat.

What's one thing that would make the Farcaster protocol better for you?

Working on Farcaster and Warpcast. Longer thoughts at https://dwr.email

having to sign in with warpcast is hard. it makes building client really difficult. If I have to create signer and pay for the gas, it would be better to delegate to a key I already have in metamask

building degencast.wtf /degencast, ex-synfutures, binance, bitmain

Chiang Mai, Mueang Chiang Mai District, Chiang Mai, Thailand

You (application) don't pay for gas, the user does. The signer key is not created onchain, the user-initiated tx to approve it is. You should not use a single key for all your users (if they revoke it, they will not be able to approve again the same key).

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), @l--o--l (fun). devcoin:$lemon3

It's the cost of using the blockchain :-(
What would be interesting @dwr.eth, is a way for the cost to be paid by a third party, not the user. Maybe using intents in the future? (Farcaster is a could be a great intent pool, btw)

user do need to pay and that is likely disincentivising