frames-devs

Farcaster Devs

Frame builder roll call: if we add eth_signTypedData_v4 as a transaction method, what new features will you build? (Have already heard from many of you, but please reply to help us prioritize!)

Thinking about adding support for signatures to frames. What would you build?

I'm eth newbie..just learning
(working on @farcaster)

terminally.online

Who would be the signer? I guess custody wallet. 
Would you also add the FC client as a signer? In many cases, a signature by WC would be good enough for me.

Dad, geek, conversation liquidity provider. vrypan.net (home), /weatherxm (work), @l--o--l (fun). Also https://paragraph.xyz/@purplesubmarine

The frame would request a signature from the connected wallet, just like when a dapp prompts you for a typed signature.

Yes, connected wallet, my bad. I was thinking if the signature can be provided from the app (wc) or the signer (same signer, different type of signature algo). In many cases, this would be enough assurance, while making the UX really smooth.

For example, if Warpcast, Nook, Supercast had known wallets, I'll trust a signature by these wallets that says "FID=280 requested this tx" in many cases like NFT minting, voting about small decisions, etc.