Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/tap
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
when the frame sdk is(hopefully) updated to allow for signer access/creation, there will be some cool unlocks for tap videos: - like/recast/comment on a video directly from the frame - upload/create new videos directly from the frame hoping these will be possible to implement soon!!
4 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
What does like/recast/comment look at the protocol level? Does each video have it's own cast I can react to, or is it FIP-2?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
right now i just mean reacting to the cast the video is embedded in(just like any other reaction, not any FIP-2 stuff although there could be some fun stuff to explore there) the main hurdle i had was making a signer in a v2 frame but i *think* i have a solid workaround for now
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Imo, these should be social actions offered by the sdk. The frame is rendered inside a client that already has a signer, the frame should be able to tell the client the user wants to react to a cast and do it (maybe with an extra confirmation step).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
especially just for reacting i agree, there certainly shouldn't be access to the warpcast signer though i think a good solution here is a developer can either take *very fine grained* actions with the existing signer if the user consents, or the developer is able to have the user create a brand new signer (and both should happen through the frame sdk)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Having your own signer opens a lot of possibilities. Personally, the way signers work today, the implications and the friction required to revoke one, I'm very reluctant to casually approve new ones. But `sdk.action.like(cast)` seems like a reasonable thing to have. Frames could abuse it, and trigger 100 likes, that's why the client should ask for confirmation, and I think it'd be pretty safe and simple.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

dylan pfp
dylan
@dylsteck.eth
for sure, i think the vast majority not just of v2 frames but also of farcaster apps in general don't need a signer at all and if so would just need something small such as the like action you're talking about
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction