Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Chronosensitivity pfp
Chronosensitivity
@chronosensitive
I found out about this book from an interview with the Safdie Brothers. They said it changed their pov about film. I completely agree. It’s a bit reactionary and it repeats itself, but it fundamentally questions the pervading narrative of how film, and therefore art, communicates.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

tim/vortac pfp
tim/vortac
@vortac
Thanks for sharing, today we have a few film and cinema-related contributions, the thematic spectrum of /the-library is expanding, which is great πŸ™ 234 $DEGEN πŸ«΄πŸ–€
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Chronosensitivity pfp
Chronosensitivity
@chronosensitive
πŸ™ tyty. It’s funny: When I was thinking about it, I realized that even though I think about art a lot, most of what I actually read is just psychology and psychoanalysis.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction