Volky pfp

Volky

@volky.eth

53 Following
528 Followers
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Sounds about right
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Hey @dot, do you intend to propose that candidate or should me and @coralorca push a new prop?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Nice catch! I'll update the gallery right away
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
https://x.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1161174071469641728?t=_h2lOvqIRANJy5CgtXr3Xg&s=19 Not even sure how we know about that.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
nah https://warpcast.com/volky.eth/0x9b8291
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Prediction markets should only be used when the resolution is unambiguous, otherwise they are pointless
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
But on blockchains the judgment has very low ambiguity, so it's easy to evaluate the honesty of a judge. Prediction markets aren't always as unambiguous.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
nah https://warpcast.com/volky.eth/0x65b006
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
nah https://warpcast.com/volky.eth/0x263341
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
The judge selection problem can be managed, like it is on blockchains leveraging proof of stake, where judges are algorithmically incentivized to be honest
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
nah https://warpcast.com/volky.eth/0x92998c
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Even if they have flaws and can be abused under some circumstances, they're still useful and lead to better decisions than voting
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
nah https://warpcast.com/volky.eth/0x8f8c29
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Prediction markets face the problem of judge selection. Judges can always be bribed
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Prediction markets are a better decision-making tool than voting
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
The Negation Game should allow for supportive relationships between Points
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
New Trait proposals will now include a signature of the Nouns Art Contribution Agreement (Stored on Arweave for posterity: https://z5pvlzj323gcssdd3bua3hjqckxbcsydr4ksukoidh3l46fhet4q.arweave.net/z19V5TvWzClIY9hoDZ0wEq4RSwOPFSopyBn2vninJPk) Nouners can now rest assured with verifiably CC0 contributions ✅
5 replies
3 recasts
13 reactions
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
What are some reliable (as in expected to be live for a long time) pages for signed message verification. Must support EIP-191, ok if it supports EIP-712 too. Desirable: accepts prefilling via URI query params. There's https://etherscan.io/verifiedSignatures, but I'm looking for a standalone verification page
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
Now we start lobbying FC for Discord-like emoji support
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
⌐◧-◧ it*
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction