Volky
@volky.eth
The aversion to permissioned arrangements does a lot of harm in the DAO space. Voting does not work well for every kind of decision Civilization was built on top of trustful assumptions. As long as we make sure trusted roles are not capturable like in the status quo, we will be much better off relying on them.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Elad
@el4d
Say more?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky
@volky.eth
Here's a good resource: https://targetteal.com/en/blog/getting-rid-of-consensus-decision-making/ TL;DR: vote for role specification and attribution, then delegate decision-making power and budgets to the roles. Trying to get a majority to agree on every single decision just leads us into governance fatigue.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Elad
@el4d
Yeah understand the general theme, was curious if you had specific next steps for Nouns?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky
@volky.eth
I think conviction voting is a good experiment to run. Despite the misnomer (IMO), I see it as gathering enough support to make something happen, instead of trying to get everyone to agree that it should be done. That would create space for further experimentation, hopefully without being too contentious.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Volky
@volky.eth
The fact that people are inherently biased to being against something that they don't completely understand or that is not a hell yes severely limits the amount of experimentation that can take place. Nouns need to try plenty of different things to find something that works long-term.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
