Chase Sommer
@chasesommer.eth
So are mini-apps decentralized in some way? Or just in the sense that they use open social data?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Roadu 🎩🦊
@roadu
they are websites, the underlying functionality could be onchain for most of them like it is for yoink but the interfaces (the frames themselves) are operating on single servers currently afaik although i think maybe they could be hosted decentralized on ipfs with .eth links maybe
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Chase Sommer
@chasesommer.eth
so curious why that's such a big push vs protocol stuff 🤔
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Roadu 🎩🦊
@roadu
not sure what this means? big push vs protocol? if you mean why push frames instead of core fc protocol updates i think its because they think the frames will drive more daus
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Chase Sommer
@chasesommer.eth
lol half-thought. let me re-type: -- Why have they been pushing mini-apps so much vs pushing more stuff to the protocol? I feel like most people are here for the ideological decentralization, but that doesn't seem to get as much love these days. -- and yeah that totally makes sense, since last frame was a part of the major boom. I don't know if it's been as big of a hit this time. (not critiquing, just thinking out loud)
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
vishal
@vmathur
Personally I think mini apps can help grow FC more than new protocol features. Both are necessary long term but I think one is more useful right now
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Chase Sommer
@chasesommer.eth
Fair point! lots of reflecting these days. Thinking about the reason I joined was because Chris Dixon was excited about the decentralized part
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Roadu 🎩🦊
@roadu
+1 exactly I think this is the reason. Protocol is the foundation but doesn’t matter how nice the foundation is with nothing on top of it
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
