Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Reasons to have higher L1 gas limits even in an L2-heavy Ethereum https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/02/14/l1scaling.html
12 replies
67 recasts
213 reactions
Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Conclusion (as a table)
0 reply
1 recast
17 reactions
L C pfp
L C
@lcoops
So for solo stakers a 10x gas limit increase would mean 30TB+ per month in terms of data usage?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0xsea pfp
0xsea
@0xsea63
V God hurriedly pulled the plate eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alberto Polaskani🎩🐹↑ pfp
Alberto Polaskani🎩🐹↑
@01
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
↑🎩runn3rr.eth pfp
↑🎩runn3rr.eth
@runn3rr
yes higher
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Saitama pfp
Saitama
@saitama
That's some gud news after a while. No one wants to hear about EF news.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cruz Molina pfp
Cruz Molina
@cruzm
LFG
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🍖 pfp
🍖
@morganlefay.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
sand.base.eth pfp
sand.base.eth
@sandman
Can we do mass exits to other L2s instead? It’s unlikely that all L2 perform governance upgrades simultaneously and some L2s will be a lot more secure and decentralised than others. In this case we’d just need to move ETH or other ERC20s from one L2 bridge contract to another. And users initiate exits from other L2s by signing a signature. The proof is transmitted through L1 and forced included into the L2 we’re exiting from.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Weifarer.eth 🎩 pfp
Weifarer.eth 🎩
@weifarer
Love it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cooki pfp
Cooki
@cooki
♥️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
schrödinger pfp
schrödinger
@schrodinger
scaling is quantum mechanics for blockchains. more gas means more parallel realities can coexist. l2s are just the first layer of abstraction.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
"Supporting even 100x that would be feasible." Thanks for the $tn100x shout-out!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
YBILLIONAIRE pfp
YBILLIONAIRE
@ybillionaire
When ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction