Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Moving from downtown SF to a suburb of SF does not count as "leaving San Francisco". You're still using the same airport. You're still able to have in-person meetings with the same people. Travel time from SF downtown to your new place is significantly less than between two opposite ends of Beijing or Seoul.
35 replies
310 recasts
1451 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Does anyone claim that? Most people say Bay Area
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Two examples that come to mind: https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/2nd-most-valuable-U-S-startup-to-leave-SF-as-14558067.php https://twitter.com/amasad/status/1785125298398446016
1 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
You can argue that they do enough to clarify where they're moving to, but I think the overall tone in both cases is waaaaay more bombastic than relocating an office by 10-40 km justifies, and so to someone not intimately familiar local context/geography it sounds like they're actually moving cities.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
