Exit games for EVM validiums: the return of Plasma

Exit games for EVM validiums: the return of Plasma

https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2023/11/14/neoplasma.html

app.intersend.io | sequence. pimlico. poap. polygon. consensys. paxful. flipside crypto. dash. bridgewater. darpa. secdef. navy. dia | linktr.ee/alexanderchopan

I replied to another thread but let me ask the question here, please:

PhD in aviation ∩ climate science | Aviator, diver, ETH maxi, nexialist | Host of /diving /ethfinance /eth-staker /geopolitics /science /singapore /thomas

yeah they can totally coexist imo

Different styles of L2 for different goals

I replied to another thread but let me ask the question here, please:

https://warpcast.com/aviationdoctor.eth/0x768cc852

For most of these schemes I feel like there's a lot of effort being made to guarantee the availability of *anything* in the state tree. That makes sense for Uniswap, and other common infrastructure, but I feel like the vast majority of state on Ethereum now could be forgotten with no issues. 
Can state be non-fungible?

Whats the difference between validiums and plasma?

Hey Vitalik

We know the rollup centric roadmap is kinda set in stone at this point

But

Have you looked at the EthscriptionsVM as a possible alternative to scaling Ethereum 

+ no trust assumptions
+ no fragmentation
+ no bridging
+ works today

Hey Vitalik

We know the rollup centric roadmap is kinda set in stone at this point

But

Have you looked at the EthscriptionsVM as a possible alternative to scaling Ethereum 

+ no trust assumptions
+ no fragmentation
+ no bridging
+ works today

https://docs.ethscriptions.com/overview/introducing-ethscriptions