Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vanessa Williams
@fridgebuzz.eth
Scrolling through this channel it’s disappointing to see the overwhelming majority of images are of women—scantily clad, or idealized. Given a magical machine that can make any picture at all, are beautiful, slim, young (usually white or Asian) women all that we can imagine? As an artist, have you ever asked yourself: why am I placing a conventionally pretty, young woman in this image? Why not a man? Or an old woman? Or two teenaged boys? Or a dog? If you’re sexually oriented towards women, are you making art or expressing your sexual fantasies? If you’re a woman, is she meant to be you? If so, do you look anything like her? Or do you wish you did? Is that why you put her there? I’m not going to lecture about “the male gaze.” Either you know about it already or you can look it up. But I hope people will think and look at little more critically at what people who call themselves AI artists—including themselves—are making.
8 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions
Victor Doval
@vicdoval
This prompt was blocked by bing-dalle3: "ugly person"
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Vanessa Williams
@fridgebuzz.eth
Wow! I can sort of understand that. What exactly is “ugly”? Is anyone truly ugly? But would it reject something like “an old woman with dark, weathered skin, many wrinkles and care lines and a nose too large for her face” (just made up on the fly)? She’s not ugly, just not white, young, and conventionally beautiful. I think it’s possible to force these tools out of their ruts if you’re not lazy about it.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
