max
@maxp.eth
Lens launching into the world of L3s to meet their scaling needs, interesting https://twitter.com/LensProtocol/status/1651270830729592832?s=20
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Greg
@greg
“While content on Lens may include an on-chain transaction, the content data is linked to a data availability location” … so Farcaster Hubs? 😅
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
It's honestly a bad architecture - you have all the problems and costs of writing to blockchains and none of the benefits of them. If you're going to make people do on-chain transactions, put the whole thing on-chain so the devex is great, don't use unreliable pointers to off-chain stuff.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vern
@vern
The new architecture is orders of magnitude cheaper and more performant because it's leverage Arweave/Bundlr rather than broadcasting every tx to Polygon directly. Benefit is they inherity the strong CR + DA guarantees of Arweave/Bundlr, while reducing costs + latency.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vern
@vern
The big difference here is that if user's want the composability of EVM (e.g., having posts be NFTs) they can, but it's optional -- not the default. That's a step in the right direction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I was talking about v1, I think v2 is an improvement over that
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
