Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
GM Builders! There was a suggestion to change the proposal threshold back to 1 (currently 2 needed). Drop comments here as well with any feedback. I’ll also add it to the agenda for Thursday’s DAO meeting. cc: @kmacb.eth https://discord.com/channels/1039595167910477936/1178772723133067334
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

V pfp
V
@valcoholics
@kmacb.eth the convo back in june was 1 token until 400 tokens but a prop did not go up in time
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Ha pretty good timing 387
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
Oh wait are you saying it was to lower to 1 until 400 (my hasty reply🤦‍♂️ ) or keep at 2 until 400?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

V pfp
V
@valcoholics
it was the first but months ago so what benchmark did you have in mind now ?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

KMac🍌 ⏩ pfp
KMac🍌 ⏩
@kmacb.eth
This isn't the highest prio here imo unless folks think this impacts token demand in some adverse way. I was looking for a way to make props when I saw this constraint. Haven't reflected much on if that's a good thing or bad thing for token demand. Can see both sides. As a noob not being able to propose is a surprise
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction