Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jw 🦺 ERC6551 pfp
jw 🦺 ERC6551
@0xjw.eth
Worked on a multi-chain contract factory at ETH NY this weekend. All deployments and admin actions originate from a single Safe on a single chain, passing bytecode and calldata over a bridge. No more nonce issues or one-Safe-per-chain setups. Would love feedback :) https://github.com/jaydenwindle/safe-create2
7 replies
6 recasts
28 reactions

Vaibhav pfp
Vaibhav
@vaibhavchellani
Good hack! have thought about this a decent bit, so sharing my 2 cents, probably not the best idea to use a bridge to do this deployer can just sign over the bytecode and relayers can send the bytecode across-chains bridge adds new trust to the system as well as is expensive I say this as a bridge builder myself.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jw 🦺 ERC6551 pfp
jw 🦺 ERC6551
@0xjw.eth
Thanks! This is a neat idea, but how would it work with a Safe as the deployer (since the Safe only exists on one chain)? Agreed on trust, this is essentially trusting that a bridge can handle cross-chain actions in a more secure/decentralized way than you can manage a deployer private key.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction