v1rtl pfp

v1rtl

@v1rtl.eth

130 Following
267 Followers
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
Presenting Blumen v0.14 - slef custodial decentralized website deployment tool. - 4 new IPFS providers support, including @pinatacloud, 4everland, @quicknode and @lighthouse-web3 - Self hosted spec-compliant pinning service support. - New command - `blumen pin`. Pin existing websites by a CID - Various bug fixes - Updated docs on the @ensdomains + @safe deployment pipeline Doc website: https://blumen.stauro.dev Install via `pnpm i -g blumen`
3 replies
9 recasts
33 reactions
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
can you give a list of such institutions?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
apparently ~85% of all Ethereum blocks is built by 2 blockbuilders... dafuq
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
not only to fil, most IPFS providers nowadays use IPNI bc the DHT is not super efficient (afaik)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺπŸ‡ͺ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
does anything support the ERC? and does it require SC deployment or an existing one could be updated?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
that sounds like a flaw of decentralized storage, not of Swarm
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
hoping for Ladybird and Servo to succeed
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
Opera is a Chrome re-skin now afaik
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
you mean 1. Profit 2. Profit 3. Some more profit
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
2 replies
0 recast
15 reactions
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
rainbow pls ship rainbow on Accrescent store for GrapheneOS
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
TanStack Router, though not a monorepo necessarily
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
to add to 2, with IPFS when you buy storage from a provider, you buy a promise that that provider will keep your files for some time and instead of the price being calculated over a specific fixed formula (like in Swarm), providers set their own pricing plans which do not necessarily reflect the true cost of services. As an IPFS provider I can charge $10 per GB, with Swarm I can't do that
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
2 β€” incentives are not related to efficiency or performance. IPFS does not provide any storage guarantees, which is not ideal when you want to know if files are actually stored. Just having a clear incentive mechanism does not inherently mean it's more expensive. It means that you're safe from being rugged like with centralized pinning services and vendors can't dictate their rules. 3 β€” wdym can't run locally? you mean swarm's not embeddable?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
thoughts on EthSwarm?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
not sure if I follow how SSR gets distributed. Do all nodes act as reverse proxies and it's hosted on a single node?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
FluidKey is now on IPFS
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
Ρ‡Π΅Ρ„ΠΈΡ€ Π² ΡΠ»Π°Π΄ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
I don't recall paying so yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction