Content pfp
Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Safe{Wallet} frontend infrastructure was compromised. šŸ„ We need to reduce our dependence on centralized frontends! We need more independent frontends implementations or, better yet, generative frontends. At least one signer should use a different frontend. https://x.com/benbybit/status/1894768736084885929
6 replies
8 recasts
28 reactions

v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
what do you think of Blumen? Decentralized front-ends, with the domain managed by ENS and Safe + automatic replication of the IPFS distribution to multiple services https://blumen.stauro.dev
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

v1rtl pfp
v1rtl
@v1rtl.eth
here's a demo video of how it works https://warpcast.com/v1rtl.eth/0x6932a1b6
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
I'm all for making it easier to deploy local-first frontends on IPFS/ENS/etc! But keep in mind, deploying the same vulnerable code on IPFS would not make it safe from the vulnerability. šŸ«  Independent implementations that don't share the same supplychain attack surface is what's important. I'd take two totally separate implementations hosted in separate centralized servers over two identical implementations both on IPFS.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction