Content
@
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
zk without use case is useless profiles without use case are useless tornado cash works, "fractional identity" doesn't linkedin works, hundreds of linktree clones don't no one cares about your identity no one cares about verifications no one cares about zero knowledge no one cares about social graph either
4 replies
2 recasts
19 reactions
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
source: i've built all of these things
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
I immediately thought of you when I saw that Vitalic post and V’s response today
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
oh damn i missed it, what post and response?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
accountless.eth
@accountless.eth
https://warpcast.com/v/0x700df1bf see thread bc he is referring to vitalik post
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
tytyvm 🙏
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I agree with @warpcastadmin.eth in principle though — zk is a very tough UX and so you need to find something that is really important to people, and not just marginally useful in order to create something that gets usage
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
borodutch
@warpcastadmin.eth
hm, let's say we wave a magic wand and zk ux stops sucking, i.e. the proof generation is instant, verification too, so ux is on the same level of sucking as sending a tx on a blockchain i still think no one would care if it's zk or centralized authority under the hood, i.e. zk is *not* a differentiator for most apps
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Varun Srinivasan
@v
I would agree — start centralized, then if it’s working and you’ve reached scale consider zk
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
