Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
I may be missing something, but if I read FIP-2 correctly, this means that FC can be used to comment and react to any URL. Does this mean I could use FC as my commenting system for a blog? If so, how come no one is working on this? https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/71
6 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
yes you can! i believe paragraph and eventcaster both use this feature today
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
wow! This is so big. React and comment on: - NFTs (I see that channels are comments on specific ERC721 contracts) - Any page on the web (blog posts, YouTube videos, etc) Clients chould handle better these cases, like showing "This is a reaction to http://......" and allowing a user to see all reactions/casts on a URL.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Colin pfp
Colin
@colin
Yup that’s right! https://paragraph.xyz/@blog/farcaster-comments Cc @vrypan.eth
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction