Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
An interesting Farcaster idea: what if apps paid for storage, not users? - Apps buy a chunk of bytes. - Free to allocate to casts, reactions, follows in any way. - Free to assign to users in any way (fixed rate, free) - Lower cost by avoiding "unused storage" h/t to @vrypan.eth @deodad and @sds
24 replies
8 recasts
92 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Main benefits are that: 1. Cost of onboarding new users is lowered. Apps can front users and kick them out if they are spammy later. 2. Storage utilization is more efficient. Lots of users overpay and don't use bytes, apps could get better economies of scale.
2 replies
1 recast
35 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
As far as storage goes, the rough rule is that a user can only add data if the app has more bytes left. Otherwise the app has to find some way to free up space or pay for more data. This is a lot more complexity for app developers but might be better for users in the long run by providing different models of paying for storage. Warpcast might offer each user a flat fee for a flat amount of storage (like today), Supercast might offer free signups and kick out spammy users aggressively.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

Harris pfp
Harris
@harris-
I actually thought this was how it was intended to be used when I first read the documentation 😂 I think it previously mentioned something about paying for storage for apps / servers or something
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction