Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
9-5 ā°
@mjfunds
So here is my turn to get the Mic After funding all marketing expenses, getting listed on directories, paybot, swapbot, meme contests, raid contests, swap contests, and many more... I did end up selling 1000$ total. $400 of which came before the Based Ventures purchase (which btw everything was public information) and $600 after. I understood @maretus.eth concerns of how this is a bad look which i have sent him back the 1eth to give it back. The snapshot provided was indeed a snipe bot $77 purchase as soon as /9to5 launched and $2.2k sell. My $600 sell had an estimate of ~6% price impact. I have came to a realization that the sell after BV purchase was indeed a bad look on us which once again i had no problem returning the 1eth back. I want to do the right thing and was not willing to transfer any ownership over to @maretus.eth. For all those who has been hurt, please drop your wallet addresses down below and i will be giving all my position away ~57mm tokens
17 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Plants
@plantsnft
The drama šæ Feels like im back on X
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Uncle HODL
@unclehodl.eth
I agree, but it's important that the Farcaster community develops a standard for dealing with these occurrences. Ideally, with all the additional data available to us it should be easy to shun this sort of behavior and to blackball anyone that thinks they can use us as mere exit liq š§
4 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
9-5 ā°
@mjfunds
selling $1000 worth of token is an exit liquidity? I understand the sell after based venture sell, which again i have paid the 1 eth back to @maretus.eth
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Plants
@plantsnft
100% I hope the truth comes out cause itās so abnormal to see this here. Been months since I saw a post like this (cause I stay off x now) Letās see the wallet addys
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
