Farcaster

Some chatter on this, especially around the “eat their lunch” phrasing

My perspective as a user: 

Warpcast has a difficult role to play: as the largest product on the Farcaster protocol, their actions will drive the majority of new user growth

Along the way, there will be other apps that emerge to fill gaps in the Warpcast value prop. Scheduled casts, onchain actions, real time chat, etc

As those features are validated by users, the Warpcast team is then faced with a choice: integrate these features into the main app (thereby stimulating growth), or intentionally avoid building it to reduce competition with ecosystem partners 

The rub: if Farcaster doesn’t significantly grow, then all ecosystem apps will likely die anyway due to lack of sufficient users. 

My personal framework around this topic is less vibes driven and more realpolitik; as an app builder, you have to be prepared for your great feature idea to be copied as soon as it’s proven to be successful with users.

it's really simple: merkle should be using onchain legos to catalyze further 3rd party legos. no mods? not serious.

posting anonymously from @warpcast frames

no meritocratic opportunity without shmoozing? not serious. 