Ethereum

One man’s problems are another man’s greatest asset. Ethereum (and other blockchains) is a network where adversaries such as US and North Korea can operate at the same time. This is a feature not a bug. Taking this a step further, alliances and treaties should involve skin in the game: ie you stake a percentage of your federal reserves to guarantee you will keep your promise (weather this is a military alliance or any time of state level agreements) if you don’t, you lose your stake and tank your economy.

Building and having fun

funstash.fun | zyield.fi | monkeyvault.net

https://SassyHash.artlu.xyz/download

See pinned cast frame for more.

PFP is my Native.fun Print, genart unique hash of wallet txns -> Faces of Farcaster

That's the beauty of those networks, on the one hand you can perform the biggest heist in history and launder the proceeds with a tumbler, but on the other, your on-chain footprint will be there forever to haunt your reputation. I don't think anyone should get away with this, hence why I alluded to having skin in the game.

this sounds like cope?

this happens because societies have accepted (for the time being) a limited space where code-is-law, the connections to this space are rickety, and North Korea has purchased physical impunity for itself.

It does not sound like it's intrinsic to the tech.

Counterpoint: could Syria, Venezuela, or Taiwan could get away with behaving onchain as North Korea does? similar populations, range of global influence. If so, then there's your "feature not a bug"