Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

proxy pfp
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
$PROXY listed on the /farcaster-index what will be the first token launched on /proxyswap to join us?
2 replies
1 recast
19 reactions

gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅ pfp
gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅
@gogol
Cenezuela first overseas welcoming round would be nice
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

proxy pfp
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
I'm eager to get /cenezuela onto proxyswap. imo just relaunch the token off mintclub, I'll help support some liquidity until; they are off the ground
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅ pfp
gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅
@gogol
could both co-exist? mintclub + LP degen and base chains
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

proxy pfp
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
I think its hard for both to exist, but could be possible. the team should synch with the mint.club team to discuss the details of the bonding curve problem is it opens up an arb, price divergence between the curve and the dex i've seen tokens try it
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅ pfp
gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅
@gogol
@swindler.eth and @malenia FYI
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

PG pfp
PG
@malenia
My personal opinion: let's abandon mint club. Launch a new token. Fairly distribute the 10% to top 10 holders, rest goes to liquidity pool. I need all of cult members' view on this.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅ pfp
gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅
@gogol
why top 10 holders only? only abandon mint club if doable with an egalitarian way also proposals for incoming massive lock-ups (300M+) explained to holders will help easing the doubts
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

PG pfp
PG
@malenia
Lock ups will be sent to 0xdead address
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅ pfp
gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅
@gogol
πŸ”₯🎩 magnifique about the fair drop, why top 10 holders only?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

PG pfp
PG
@malenia
Dropping to everyone requires large liquidity. I think top holders and day one holders (cult group members) should get only. Also, usually teams get 10% of total supply. In this case team would get 2-3% i guess. I think quite fair.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅ pfp
gogol on meth πŸ”΅πŸ”΅
@gogol
imho, not a gud idea, why airdropping OGs and paygroup if you later kill the token and drop a new one? only way to do this is a 1/1 lp extraction from mintclub, and innovate in making both co-exist for some time at least. That option you propose will look like a honeypot, we need to do as egalitarian as possible.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

PG pfp
PG
@malenia
I don't think co-existing coins will be a good idea. We tried on degenswap and it didn't end up well. Either we stay on mintclub forever or abandon. Also haven't talked to mintclub admins yet.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

cool cat pfp
cool cat
@tree-of-life
Wdym u tried DegenSwap and it didn't end up well lol? The bonding curve on mint club requires a lot of degen tho, that was a wrong decision since the very start. I guess you didn't expect Cenez to get that big. Also I found out about Cenez from mint club, was never gonna buy it otherwise.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

PG pfp
PG
@malenia
Never thought it could gain that attraction. We didnt think on numbers that much. We were just meme'ing. Like i said, community should decide on that. I'm okay either way and wont force anything.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cool cat pfp
cool cat
@tree-of-life
Personally I do like Mint club. But if the final decision is to launch a new token, all token holders should get their fair share. I also like the idea of using mint club to bootstrap liquidity.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

PG pfp
PG
@malenia
Yeah everyone get their share actually. Liquidity on mintclub is too low rn.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction