bad communication kills projects 

as a founder or leader, you need to take accountability for your actions

if you lean into tokens, you must understand their zero sum nature, you must understand what it means to mention them in any capacity 

at a bare minimum, hire comms on a one-off contract & let them conduct a pre-lunch audit

if you cast or tweet about a token that was incubated inside your project, you are associating yourself indefinitely with that team & token—whatever happens to that token now shines on you

if you tag a token in any pre-lunch materials & people buy up scams thinking it’s that tagged token—that’s on you 

if you’re unsure whether or not you, as the project leader, is going to wholeheartedly embrace a token as THE project token—do not talk about it at all 

having “fun” or not, spurring speculation purely for hype or engagement is irresponsible as a founder 

seeing this far too often 

protect your users or lose em

all you have is trust; don’t take that lightly

yappin in /midwits & creating idle rpg /animarising

Basically, influence should stay neutral else it’ll seem like they choose a side

𝒞𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓁 𝑒𝓃𝑔𝒾𝓃𝑒𝑒𝓇—𝒮𝓀𝑒𝓉𝒸𝒽.𝐹𝓊𝓃—𝒻𝓇𝒾𝑒𝓃𝒹𝓁𝓎 𝓃𝑒𝒾𝑔𝒽𝒷𝑜𝓇𝒽𝑜𝑜𝒹 𝓃𝑜𝑜𝒷—𝑒𝓉𝒽 𝓃𝑒𝓌𝒷𝒾𝑒 🌴

if you have influence, you have responsibility whether you like it or not 

you can absolutely talk about tokens & you can absolutely tease them 

but you need to vet & you need to use proper disclosures, especially as a founder