Farcaster

A reminder on channels

- Channels are *not* decentralized yet

- Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior

- When channels are decentralized and incorporated into the protocol later this year (likely onchain!), then you can do what you want! Just like FIDs

- Channels are *not* decentralized yet
- Therefore we have the right to take is away?

- Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior
- Then we need a better first come first serve system, if they would have been fully decentralised, what would you do then?

🛠️ Building packd.io

🔗 Eth Solo Staker | Node Operator for RocketPool, ether.fi, Gnosischain

🦇 🔊

> Therefore we have the right to take is away?

Currently, yes! In the future, no.

> if they would have been fully decentralised, what would you do then?

If it was decentralized, then I couldn't? :)

Question for you: Is it moral for a squatter to extract value from something they didn't build?

tomato

I am once again demanding that the usurper who holds the handle @tomato be removed from the platform, and for the handle to be given to me, the rightful owner.

@dwr, I'll give you 100 warps if you can make this happen. It's a generous offer.

Speaking of squatters...
https://warpcast.com/tomato.eth/0x0c14e442

Artist from the future.

NFTs since 1998.

Bitcoin since 1985.

Your second favorite artist's second favorite artist.

https://manifold.gallery/tomato

Don't be so salty, it will just gonna turn you into a potato chip.