Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Something I’ve been thinking about since chatting with @ccarella.eth on ZEROPOD a couple weeks ago: There *is* an explicit playbook for RFV campaigns, and it *was* used in nouns in the season leading to Fork 0. Some things are a little more obvious in hindsight. 👇
1 reply
2 recasts
8 reactions
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
Seed disorder. ✔️ Sow division. ✔️ Call into question the intentions / competence of the project founders. ✔️ FUD passionate DAO contributors both inside and outside the DAO. ✔️ Mask the arb play with the discontent sown above ✔️ 👇
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Toady Hawk
@toadyhawk.eth
We’re in a better place now, but like a partner emerging from a toxic relationship, I think nouners should also ask ourselves if there might be certain ideas we hold to be true from Season 2 that have potentially been unfairly influenced by these narratives that were spun without the best intentions. I know I had to.
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
₿Ξnbodhi ✦⁺
@benbodhi
Yep, clear as day even early on, especially when you’ve seen it, heard them talk about the trade and can see it blatantly playing out.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Davin クマ
@davinoyesigye
🤔 in hindsight it looks obvious! But is it a true worth it play? many people took a huge haircut on their nouns.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
⌐◨-◨ BiGSHOT ⌐◨-◨
@bigshotklim
So what do we do now. How do you retain passion and bring out the best best people to build big things here?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hindsight
@hindsight
Lol no mention of the absolute waste of funds eliminating any demand to own a noun which lead to the massive discount being there in the first place?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
