politics

Classic case for capitalism is that it'll usually win in the shortest terms.

For example. you privatize education, so less tax burden on citizens. Of course by turning your education into a profit-machine, you're changing the objective function of your system. Over time, your system will optimize for profit instead of the optimizing for better education.

Same applies to reducing protections for health, food, family programs, etc.

What I'm saying is, starting from the same point, invisible hand cannot compete with planned systems on longer periods.

https://chainleft.art

Dad, data scientist, blockchain native artist.

Power consolidation=evil.

Would love for anyone who disagrees to explain health care costs in the states vs the rest of the developed world.

NFT enjoyooor, crypto student, $DEGEN🎩, intergalactic blockchain explorer. I'm not a moon boi, I'm a space man✨ 👨‍🚀✨ /memestoanend

We don't have a free market health care system.

I want privacy and the freedom to do what I want, when I want, and where I want as long as I am harming no one. Why is that so much to ask? $ANON

Yes as are most things, but often when you try something but you don't go all the way, you get a bad result when you could of gotten a good result if you had just taken it all the way to the finish line. An analogy is drug decriminalization doesn't work but drug legalization does work. Oregon tried decrim, it failed because decrim doesn't remove the black market and the inflated profits that cause crime. So people assume if decrim failed then obviously legalization would be worse. So they go backwards instead of forward.
The same applies to US healthcare, the partially free market model doesn't work, so people wrongly assume that a fully or more free market model would be even worse, so they go backwards instead of forwards.

It's "freer" than other developed nations. It's not binary, it's a spectrum.