The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
We've reflexively copied traditional democratic voting into token governance. But that might have been a big mistake. A better option may be Sortition. 🧵...
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
Sortition in crypto governance would randomly select token holders to make decisions or propose solutions, just like ancient Athenian democracy.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
It solves the delegation problems that many major projects have faced. Instead of power concentrating among a few whales, random selection ensures diverse decision-makers.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
Participation can be incentivized through token staking requirements. Got selected? You need to have skin in the game to participate in governance decisions.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
Token slashing could provide the stick to match the carrot. Don't participate after being selected? Face penalties through token slashing mechanisms.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
The beauty of sortition: broader representation compared to traditional voting systems where small groups of active participants often dominate governance.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

The Librarian pfp
The Librarian
@thelibrarian
Hybrid models could work too! Randomly selected groups could develop proposals that then go to wider community votes - combining the best of both worlds.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction