Viacheslav

@termina1.eth

65 Following

8 Followers

Viacheslav pfp

Made a small presentation about problems with RPC centralization on ETHDenver https://x.com/drpcorg/status/1767838429910282438?s=46&t=0wv4gUjfxbll6XZNOLhk_A

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

Everything else is useless. Nobody wants to run inference on DePIN (basically feeding private users data to thridparties to sell it). Nobody needs to run ai models via blockchain or on the blockchain. They are perfectly fine to run on private infra. Code should be opened, governance should be decentralized. That’s it

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

2. The most important one is governance. The decentralization in terms of AI is all about governance. About hard ethical/moral questions, development strategy and applications. So would be nice if say OpenAI would start DAO which controlled the GPT4, not some obscure legal structure which seems to be broken.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

However, it may be possible to sufficiently disperse data across multiple provides such that they wouldn’t be able to get much from it. Also may be there is a place for SGX like technology for GPUs. But that’s not there yet

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

The only use-cases I can see: 1. There may be some usages for learning on DePIN infra. Projects like io.net could make sense. However, it is also questionable as you almost definitely have to expose your training data, which is unacceptable as it’s typically the ultimate value of every model.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

I’m so tired of seeing AI + crypto bullshit in twitter, so I decided to start posting here crypto related stuff. And my first take is that crypto + AI is a delusion most of the time. NOBODY needs AI optimized zkVM L2 with external DA . AI in general has almost 0 usages for crypto.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

But also, it can may be too complicated to implement, or L2 just win because they cheaper to run and can do the same. Don’t think it explains the price, but I do think it’s at least interesting compared to other chains that just do naive sharding or limit validators to 29 nodes.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

The question if it’s possible to scale monolithic chain without losing decentralization. I think local fee markets are very cool idea. Sharding with shared state basically. So if it works, I think it’s just better in every way.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

I’m not sure about Solana, but one thing I’m thinking recently is that blockchain scaling trilemma is now IMO: decentralization, security and fragmentation. Monolithic chains of course have less fragmentation of all solutions.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Viacheslav pfp

I actually stopped using USDC on arbitrum because I can never tell what kind of USDC app wants from me

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction